


K&N Replacement Air Filter 10-13 Audi A8 Quattro 4.2L V8 (2 required)
Marsoni
M251S
Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping.
Friday, May 29
K&N Replacement Air Filter 10-13 Audi A8 Quattro 4.2L V8 (2 required)SKU: E 1996 UPC: 024844286031 K&N Replacement Air Filter 2010 13 Audi A8 Quattro 4. 2L V8 (2 required) The K&N E 1996 is a direct drop in replacement air filter for the 2010 2013 Audi A8 Quattro equipped with the 4. 2L V8 engine. This washable reusable filter uses layered oiled cotton media to increase airflow deliver more horsepower and capture contaminants for engine protection. Two filters are required per vehicle for full airbox coverage and
Quick Dispatch:
Your K&N Replacement Air Filter 10-13 Audi A8 Quattro 4.2L V8 (2 required) orders ship within 1-2 business days.
Delivery Options:
- Standard: 3-7 business days
- Fast: 2-3 business days
- Express: 1-2 business days
Order Tracking:
You'll receive a tracking link by email once your K&N Replacement Air Filter 10-13 Audi A8 Quattro 4.2L V8 (2 required) ships.
Need Help?
Questions about K&N Replacement Air Filter 10-13 Audi A8 Quattro 4.2L V8 (2 required), sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.
Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for K&N Replacement Air Filter 10-13 Audi A8 Quattro 4.2L V8 (2 required) in your area.
Get Shipping Estimates
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
You may also like
4.0 ★★★★★
Based on 668 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 1
Kia CarnivalSXP 2024
Color: for Kia Carnival 2022-2024
What am I missing?? This does not fit into the vent in my new Carnival. Returning.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 26, 2024
★★★★★ 5
Good
Color: for Kia Carnival 2022-2024
Like the quality and it fit well
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 26, 2024
★★★★★ 5
Works well, looks stupid with the logo display
This fits well in the vent frame and I am still able to close my vent. I really like the mount cause it solves a huge problem of where to put my phone securely... but I also hate it as well, because of the ugly logo on the face of it. "Batdiary"? Seriously? If I keep it I will look for a way to get rid of (or cover up) the extremely unattractive logo they selected. It makes it (and my trucks interior) look loke something for a child. I give it 5 stars because it deserves better than the 3.9 it had at the time of posting this. But for the love of everything clean and classy but still needing a mount, get rid of the bat logo!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 30, 2026
★★★★★ 4
No cheap plastic
Holds good
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 24, 2026
★★★★★ 3
Good, but minor issues
The build quality seemed impressive and it felt sturdy. When installed, it definitely stayed in the air vent without wiggling or coming loose after quite a bit of off roading and driving over washboards.
I returned this thing and bought the "off roam" competitor because of two reasons:
1) the ball joints don't tighten down hard enough to lock the position of the mount firmly. It grips well when you don't touch it, but if you are trying to put the phone into the mount without both hands, it shifts and moves with minimal pressure. Kind of annoying for me, I feel the ball joints should tighten enough not to budge if given a tiny bit of force or accidental bump.
2) the inner springs of the phone holder started loosening and making an obnoxious vibrating/rattling sound after about a month. Any bump or minor rough surface caused this thing to rattle like loose change in a cup holder IF THE PHONE WASNT IN IT. If the phone was in the holder it didn't do this at all. It started to drive me crazy.
If you can get past these two things it's built well enough and works perfectly fine. I just expect a bit more for $50-$60.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 1, 2025