Skip to content

Festool ETSC 125-Basic Akku Exzenterschleifer ( 576370 ) 18 V 125 mm Brushless + Systainer - ohne Akku, ohne Ladegerät - Nachfolger von 201533

Marsoni M251S
Sale price$166.38
Pay 4 payments of $41.59 a month.Shop Pay
Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29
Festool ETSC 125-Basic Akku Exzenterschleifer ( 576370 ) 18 V 125 mm Brushless + Systainer - ohne Akku, ohne Ladegerät - Nachfolger von 201533Lieferumfang: 1x Festool ETSC 125 Akku Exzenterschleifer 1x Festool PROTECTOR 1x Longlife Staubfangbeutel 1x StickFix Schleifteller 125 mm 1x Systainer SYS3 187 ohne Akku, ohne Ladegert Produktbeschreibung: Der Exzenterschleifer ETSC 125 von Festool ist ermglicht, durch sein geringes Gewicht und seine perfekte Ergonomie, mobiles und ermdungsarmes arbeiten. Er ist so gearbeitet, dass er bequem mit einer Hand bedient werden kann, egal ob Links oder
Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your Festool ETSC 125-Basic Akku Exzenterschleifer ( 576370 ) 18 V 125 mm Brushless + Systainer - ohne Akku, ohne Ladegerät - Nachfolger von 201533 orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

  • Standard: 3-7 business days
  • Fast: 2-3 business days
  • Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your Festool ETSC 125-Basic Akku Exzenterschleifer ( 576370 ) 18 V 125 mm Brushless + Systainer - ohne Akku, ohne Ladegerät - Nachfolger von 201533 ships.

Need Help?
Questions about Festool ETSC 125-Basic Akku Exzenterschleifer ( 576370 ) 18 V 125 mm Brushless + Systainer - ohne Akku, ohne Ladegerät - Nachfolger von 201533, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for Festool ETSC 125-Basic Akku Exzenterschleifer ( 576370 ) 18 V 125 mm Brushless + Systainer - ohne Akku, ohne Ladegerät - Nachfolger von 201533 in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 2464 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
K
Verified Purchase
Kate C.
Natrona Heights, US
★★★★★ 5
Lasts longer than average roll
Size: 24 Double Rolls (2 Ply)
Ok. I have to admit. This toilet paper checks out all the boxes. Its very soft. It really DOES last longer and it's toxins free. Great stuff.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 13, 2026
J
Verified Purchase
jennifer
Bozeman, US
★★★★★ 5
Safe and reliable TP for the family
Size: 24 Double Rolls (2 Ply)
This brand is the best and softest bamboo TP I have purchased. This is a staple in my house, its durable and longer lasting than other brands I have tried. Cost of this is cheaper than most others as well, bonus. Highly absorbent. Package size it suitable for the price. Also good for septic systems
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 26, 2026
L
Verified Purchase
Laurel S.
Belleville, US
★★★★★ 3
Not my favorite
Size: 24 Double Rolls (2 Ply)
I've tried quite a few bamboo toilet paper brands, and this isn't a favorite. Even at 2-ply it's thin. It has a good texture while being soft, and lint free as advertised, but I find we use more of this brand due to it being thinner. It has a lower price point than some of the premium brands, but a classic case of "you get what you pay for" and since we use more it doesn't really save any money anyway. Also it says plastic free, but comes in plastic packaging - it's not clear if it is eco-plastic/ biodegradable or not. It's not a bad product, and everyone likes something different and has their own priorities, but personally I won't reorder.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 16, 2026
S
Verified Purchase
Susan Goddard
Natrona Heights, US
★★★★★ 5
Good quality and absorbancy
Size: 24 Double Rolls (2 Ply)
Was a little leery about bamboo toilet paper but I was tired of the how, even the 3 ply expensive toilet papers I've been buying, were not very absorbent. I must say I am pleasantly surprised. The sheets are smaller but they don't fall apart like the others and I think they are very absorbent even tho, at first, you don't think they will be. Will definitely buy this brand again.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 1, 2026
G
Verified Purchase
Gary Woodsmith
Dallas, US
★★★★★ 4
High value, low price, minimal packaging, good deal
Size: 24 Double Rolls (2 Ply)
I would rather give 4.5 stars but it won't let me so 4 it is. It functions as a TP should, it is strong enough for dry and wet use. It is comfortable and pretty soft feeling. It is noticeably thinner than the other ones I have tried like amazon and gaias bamboo, though it is still fine. For 39c per 100 sheets, it is one of the few lower priced TP's that I've seen and it performs well enough that I will most likely keep buying this brand. Amazon bamboo is about the same price per sheet, but the amazon one is very rough. Honestly I'm more concerned about value here myself so my current rotation of bamboo TP will be between eco brand and amazon. I like this eco brand and I appreciate their minimal packaging. I would recommend the eco brand for the soft feel and low price per sheet. Keep in mind some may think it's a but thin. I would recommend the amazon bamboo for it's low price and strength, but it's very rough. So far these are the main two options I've seen for lower priced bamboo TP. In comparison to say costco TP, the kirkland blue wrapped standard TP is about 33c 100 sheets. The charmin ultra strong red packaged one is about 43c per 100 sheets so this eco brand bamboo TP is well priced considering the market. From what I've seen, in order to have everything a person could want in a bamboo TP, strength, softness, wet and dry performance, they cost a lot more than this one and personally I wouldn't bother if these lower priced brands work instead.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 25, 2025

recommand products